“The Founding Fathers”

We have all heard the term, “Forefathers”. Whose Forefathers are they? Obviously they were not Forefathers to us all…

The spirit that fuels atheism is alive and well in this country. History is slowly being rewritten before our very eyes. Why is it important not only to remember what they stood for then, but what it means to us now? What really founded this country, or who? Please allow yourself to be reminded of a few fundamental things about America.

Did you know that fifty two of the fifty five signers of the Declaration of Independence were orthodox, deeply committed Christians? The other three all believed in the Bible as divine truth, the God of the scripture, and His personal intervention.

This same Congress formed the American Bible Society. Immediately after signing the Declaration of Independence, the Congressional Congress voted to purchase and import twenty thousand copies of scripture for the people of this Nation.

Patrick Henry said, “ An appeal to arms and the God of host is all that is left us. But we shall not fight our battle alone. There is a just God that presides over the destinies of nations. The battle sir, is not to the strong alone. Is life so dear or peace so sweet as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it almighty God. I know not what course others may take, but as for me, give me liberty, or give me death.”

Much of the above statement has been deleted from our school textbooks.

Was Patrick Henry a Christian? The following year, 1776, he wrote this: “It cannot be emphasized too strongly or too often that this great nation was founded not by religionists, but by Christians; not on religions, but on the Gospel of Jesus Christ. For that reason alone, people of other faiths have been afforded freedom of worship here.”

Consider these words that Thomas Jefferson wrote on the front of his well worn Bible: “I am a real Christian, that is to say, a disciple of the doctrine of Jesus. I have little doubt that our country will soon be rallied to the unity of our Creator, and I hope, to the pure doctrine of Jesus also”

George Washington, in his farewell speech on September 19, 1796 said, “It is impossible to govern the world without God and the Bible. Of all the dispositions and habits that lead to political prosperity, our religion and morality are the indispensable supporters. Let us with caution indulge he supposition that morality can be maintained without religion…

…Reason and experience both forbid us to expect that our national morality can prevail in exclusion of religious principle.”

John Adams, our second president, who also served as chairman of the American Bible Society, in an address to military leaders said, “We have no government armed with the power capable of contending with human passions, unbridled by morality and true religion. Our Constitution was made for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other”

The very first Supreme Court Justice, John Jay said, “Providence has given to our people the choice of their rulers, and it is the duty, as well as the privilege and interest of our Christian Nation to select and prefer Christians for their rulers”

John Quincy Adams, son of John Adams, was the sixth president, and also chairman of the National Bible Society…

July 4, 1821, President Adams said, “The highest glory of the American Revolution was this: It connected in one indissoluble bond the principals of Christianity” In 1792, Congress voted this resolution: “The Congress of the United States recommends and approves the Holy Bible for use in all schools”.

Of the first 108 universities founded in America, 106 were distinctly Christian, including the first, Harvard University, chartered in 1636. In the original Harvard Student Handbook, rule number 1, was that students seeking entrance must know Latin and Greek so that they could study the scriptures: “Let every student be plainly instructed and sternly pressed to consider well, the main end of his life and studies is; to know God and Jesus Christ as the only foundation of sound knowledge and learning. And seeing the Lord only giveth wisdom, let everyone seriously set himself by prayer in secret to seek it of Him” (Prov 2:3)

For over a hundred years, more than 50% of all the Harvard graduates were pastors.

It is clear from history that the Bible and the Christian faith were foundational to our educational and judicial system. However, in 1947, there was a radical change in direction for the Supreme Court, ignoring every precedent of the Supreme Court ruling for that past one hundred sixty years. The Supreme Court ruled in a limited way to affirm a wall of separation between church and state in the public classroom.

This led to removing prayer from the public schools in 1962.

In 1963, the Supreme Court ruled that Bible reading was outlawed as unconstitutional in the public school system. The court said: “If portions of the New Testament were read without explanation, they could and have been psychologically harmful to children.” Bible reading was now unconstitutional, though the Bible was quoted 94% of the time by those who wrote our Constitution and shaped our Nation, and it’s system of education, justice, and government.

In 1965, the courts denied as unconstitutional the right of a student in a public school cafeteria to bow his head and pray audibly for his food.

In 1980, Stone vs Graham outlawed the Ten Commandments in our public schools. The Supreme Court said, “If the posted copies of the Ten Commandments were to have any effect at all, it would be to induce school children to read them. And if they read them, meditated upon them, and perhaps venerated and obeyed them, this is not a permissible objective.”

It is not a permissible objective to allow our children to follow the moral principals of the Ten Commandments? James Madison, the primary author of the Constitution of the United States, said this…

“We have staked the whole future of our new nation, not upon the power of government; far from it. We have staked the future of all our political constitutions upon the capacity of each of ourselves to govern ourselves according to the moral principals of the Ten Commandments.”

What does this mean now?

The original Constitution, and it’s primary author said himself that they, the founding Fathers of America, staked the very future of this country on this basic moral document that is the Ten Commandments. Now it is against the law for your children to even read it, or possess a copy of it in school…the very place where children’s minds are being shaped into our actual future leaders. It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to figure out what the consequences of this will be.

Our founding Fathers were not stupid.

Most of these quotes are being removed from our textbooks, and erased from history. As far as future generations go, it is up to us to make sure that our own children remain rooted in Jesus, and His doctrine. We will face seemingly unbeatable odds, as did our forefathers. They knew that they were not alone.

Your children should know this as well…

“Blessed is the nation whose God is the Lord” Psalm 33:12

Some truths are self evident…? apparently not to some. What is self evident to me, was also taught to me, and handed down through my parents parents… who stressed the importance of the message, and the importance of it’s longevity.

Atheism is alive and well, and is fueled by a spirit of “anti-God”. It is better known as “anti Christ”. This is an obvious, and self evident truth, that will not be so self evident if history is not honored, and allowed to be erased. Why use the word “honored”, instead of simple remembrance?

Because these men that took up arms, and left the care of their own safety behind, did so for me. Many of them died for me, so that I could live a free life…free from the yoke of tyranny.

More importantly, these men that are simply termed “Forefathers” are actually my Forefathers, and may or may not be yours. But they are mine. My fathers made damn sure I knew this, as well as what their fathers actually had to do, and why. They didn’t know me, but they loved me.

Do I now supposed to stand idle and silent, while their memories are desecrated? Don’t count on it. It will never happen…

…because it was also passed on to me the other Spirit that these men clung to as they watched their family and friends die, so that I might live free. I know who delivered that victory to them, and why. I also know I hold this same Spirit, and always will, to either call on again if need be, or pass on to those that follow me. I am, and will always be faithful to my heritage. Peace all.

Why All Major Religions Are True.

The biggest box…

Why all major religions are true, and their teachings valid, and why Christianity is also true which is said to be “the only way” to God. This is not a contradiction.

Dedicated to my atheist friend “Sam”

I have practiced many different religions before settling on the teachings of Christ. They all have this in common. If practiced correctly (which is always as training and guidance and practice with a master or elder. Religion can not be “studied“).

…all lead to “spiritual awareness”, bar none.

However they do not all lead to awareness of the same awareness, or even the same ‘place’. This physical universe is a ‘place’ in which one can live. It is not one that anyone has to live in. Each religion practices very unique methods that go to a unique and specific “place” in the spiritual realm…

…which is an actual place to live in not in any way different from the physical realm which is also just “as spiritual” as any other.

We all are spiritual beings, and your belief can not change this fact. Everything is “spirit“. You can say everything is (this instead), but everything’s “the same” everywhere. What makes things seem to be different?

Your focused attention and interpretation of whatever you are “focussed on”. People report this difference differently.  This doesn’t mean anything.

A good metaphor is a child on Christmas morning rushing into his living room that is alive with flickering lights. He becomes overwhelmed with the splendor, wonder and excitement of the “experience”. As he scans the scene in front of him he spots “THE BIG BOX”. He then “focuses” all his attention on the “biggest box”, and starts towards it to open it.

Now the child is so wrapped up in the contents of “the big box” he has forgotten that there are “other boxes” under the tree to open…

You are focused on one such box.

Buddhism, for instance “focuses on” a certain area or “truth” about reality in general, existence, and your “immediate environment in general”. This leads them into a very specific area that has very specific mechanics that are unique to this area only. An example would be learning how to navigate your (what is referred to as) “emotional states”. They learn that there is absolutely no difference in the experience of pain and the experience of pleasure, and that the difference that was true in physical awareness comes from your own perception and interpretation of that unique experience…and focusing your attention there.

…or your experience with the contents of “that particular box”.

This is referred to as your belief about that. The Bible refers to this as your faith (in anything). One emotional experience is “appointed” (or assigned to) by the existing person as bad, “pain”, “hurt”, and one is appointed by the existing person as the unique experience of “pleasure, happiness, ecstasy”, or as good.

The experience then becomes the reality they “live in”.

Not as many others actually believe…

…that reality comes first, then the experience of it, then the interpretation of it afterwards, then the belief in it.

That is (as scripture states)…is backwards, or perverted, inverted, take your pick. If we are actually the “Children of God” as the Bible states then we create these things for ourselves…and become trapped in them, also as the Bible states.

Without getting into the “mechanics of reality” or wasting too much time on the other major religions, (they all work on this principle), I will say that I finally settled on the teachings of Christ for two reasons. First, while all others will indeed allow you access to other existences and enhancements to the physical universe for you, they all (as I have mentioned) “go to a certain very specific place” and each has a very specific set of circumstances. Although these may be very rewarding and even pleasurable, they are still confined to their unique existences and all the “conditions” that are unique to them that you have ASSIGNED TO YOUR LIKING, or as people usually say, “believe them to be”.

This will continue to be true from that point forward for as long as you decide to believe that, or “stay in that place”. So you are “keeping the faith” no matter what you do, and the result? Look around.

Christ has, just as is echoed throughout the physical world, “set me free” from the conditions I have “appointed and changed to my liking” that I was not even aware I was in bondage to until Christ pointed this out for me.

For me, not to to me. As the band Creed writes in a popular song, unknowingly “I created my own prison” (and for the same reasons, they are a Christian band).

So keep in mind as we continue these discussions, there is no “us and them”. We will not be whisked away to “somewhere else” while people remain trapped in a decaying physical universe until they all become extinct or blow each other and their world away. There is no “going to heaven” (this is not a Biblical concept). What is a Biblical concept is a “new” heaven and a new earth.

As Jesus likes to say, It is “at hand”… now. (Matthew 10:7 KJV)

Just like those other boxes are “at hand now”.

Note to the atheist and/or naturalist:

Believe it or not although I enjoy the freedom Christ has given me, and the knowledge and understanding of life and death (which are also “places”) physical existence in the physical universe is not some “evil that must be done away with that God will destroy”. God created the these and all other “mansions” that are in His house for me, and for you, and for “whosoever will come”. So while I have denounced all bondage to the physical universe I am not banned from living here. I am just not “bound to it” now. In fact we actually own this place and all others, and we will be living here for just as long as we wish, and coming and going to and from “other places” as we simply decide to.

I enjoy physical existence as I should, and I love Rock-n-Roll music. Why shouldn’t I? But to remain trapped in a physical existence of decay and death, AND the idea that it is all eternally set in stone is hell, and God did not cause anyone to choose to remain trapped anywhere, no matter what you “believe“.

However you may if you wish enjoy that reality of a decaying existence with war, pain and eternal death that you freely decide you have to eradicate yourself in forever, because you are also free to do as you wish, and your faith works for you just as is does for all humans. Faith is “belief and assurance”. This is also Biblical concept, and it is called the “place” of weeping and gnashing of teeth” and your faith in your own belief that “this is just the way it has to be” will be honored by God just as my own will, and everyone else’s.

But as for me and my house, we will stay with the Lord of life.

Almost forgot my second reason I finally settled on the teachings of Christ. Christ freely chose to be my friend and offered to teach me to know these things, and I freely accepted His offer.

“In my Father’s house are many mansions: if it were not so, I would have told you. I go to prepare a place for you.” -Jesus. The Christ

Carry on then…

Peace

The Irony Of Evolution; Absurdity Blindness?

“Without getting into the “science” of evolution, or the ongoing controversy that continues to be a popular topic for debate, let’s just look at the underlying heart of this matter… the reason behind the invention of this theory.

It is widely known that the two main characters in this debate are theist, and atheist. It is also widely known that there are two completely different mindsets behind this and other issues surrounding theism and atheism. There are “how” people, and there are “why” people. Interestingly the “how” people seem to be a victim of their own belief, which ironically is what the “why” people claim will happen to anyone and everyone that does not accept the truth of their mindset. So…

What does the “available” evidence actually show?
It shows that only one truth can be “actually”true, obviously. One other thing for those that believe that evolution is “now a proven fact” (again). Facts are not controversial.

The “how” people say they have find out “how this happens”, and claim this…”this has been and still is a “state of “never-ending involvement” (evolution). They seem to be blind to the absurdity of something being “how this happens” one day, and the fact that if it ever changes once, at all…then that was never how it happened in the first place. Although these people (naturalist) invent new “hows” to every objection and correction to the theory their opponent makes against their ever evolving theory (that is said to be a “fact), they seem to remain blind to the absurdity of “ever evolving truth”.

So let’s look at some of the other rather ironic absurdities of this theory.

Fossils. I will never understand how anyone can say that something is the evidence used to reach a conclusion, and then make excuses about why they can not produce any of it. If you can’t produce any of the evidence you used to reach your conclusion, how can you prove your conclusion is based on evidence? Oh, I almost forgot to mention that this evidence and “fact presented to the world” as “what actually happened”; or this “truth” …has since then evolved as well. They no longer point to fossils as evidence.

Instead, we now have an “evolutionary tree of life” with branches to our common distant relatives (aunts, uncles, cousins, etc…) that makes it impossible to determine which animals morphed into which other animal or come up with a coherent chain of events, but it did provided a good excuse for the lack of the fossil records, and it did provide them with a “new replacement truth”…fossils take too long…They are rare and hard to find…blah, blah, blah..

…really? Then how could they be evidence of “the truth of yesterday” and proof for your theory that is still forced on society as “true”? And how can you point to any of that as “part of the evolution, and hold fast to the claim that “This came FROM that, when THAT was never true in the first place?

In fact, how can you now show us why that was not “just a lie that was made up” in the first place”? This is not the real shinkicking irony and obvious absurdity of this theory though. Their reason for it is.

So let’s move on to “the reason” for evolution. Survival.

If we naturally evolved and these “changes” were to make (the evolving soup) better equipped to survive in the environment, then why did the monkey people who lived outside in the elements survive “until” their replacement arrived on the scene, THEN die out (or apparently “lose their ability to survive”) …and become extinct?

Their successors, and following progressions to “modern-day man” can not survive at all in the natural environment, or “out in the open”…they will freeze to death, dehydrate, starve to death, be eaten by a cousin, or meet some other such haphazard calamity as the evidence clearly shows they actually do and will.

I don’t think this theory of changing to better equip the evolving soup for the purpose of survival checks out either.

This post is already too long, and there are many other ironic and absurd problems with this theory that we can discuss below, so I will wrap up with this absurdity.

Out of all the “differences” this one bowl of soup has “morphed into”, why can’t we carry on a discussion (such as this one) with any of our “common cousins” that are said to have the same parents”, such as grasshoppers? Just as “monkeyman” lost his ability to survive, the other “branches” seem to be losing abilities, not gaining them, and “therefore” becoming “better equipped to survive”…

You really think anyone is not going to bring up the fact that “aside from survival” ALL of these the “other branches” are now gone? This raise another absurdity. If they are “gone now” because they have been “replaced” by new and improved versions of “themselves”, then this begs the question; how is it possible that they “inherited” BETTER genes if the gene pool they inherit from couldn’t “survive”? I am sure they have an explanation that will attempt to take your mind off of this fact; the former did not “survive”, and the latter are “less able” to survive in the current “natural” environment, which makes the reasoning of survival = “this species”
can not survive, and neither will their successors in a natural environment.

So the purpose of evolving life is suicide and extinction.

All of this can be explained away (and usually is by added absurdities), but in the meantime there are no “new species” that can be shown FROM ANY AVAILABLE SOURCE PERIOD, yet they claim to know the age of the earth, and everything that has happened on the earth since it’s “birth”.

Just so you know, everyone on the planet is not blind to absurdity, and many are aware of what is actually happening. Many of us are also aware of the outcome. So enjoy this while you have time.

Oh, and one more thing. I almost forgot one more absurd fact about this evolving debate…

…The opposition to evolution has never changed their argument once, not one word of it, in thousands of years.

We were created and designed by an intelligent Creator.

Peace

Debunking The Misconception Of Sin And The Gospel

 

This is an actual response to a post from one of the online debate groups I frequent. The misconception of the meanings of the Biblical scriptures is so wide-spread I had to write an entire post to explain it to some of the people in the group. Someone asked if I would post it here so I did, and left it in its original form…

This post is a response to Allan D Griffin’s post about the original sin. Well thought out post too, as are all of his. I just want to clear up a couple of misconceptions. Apologetics is about more than debating or giving reason for the Gospel message. The other thing I want to clear up is the Gospel message. The first common misconception is about sin and what that actually is. The other is about the Gospel message and what that actually is. The two are not only related, they are absolutely the same thing.

There was no sin until man ate the fruit of the knowledge of sin, or “good and evil”. The misconception is that sin is an action. Adam “sinned”, he did not commit a crime, or as Allan tries to convey in his post “do something wrong” (and did a pretty good job too. I am surprised that it wasn’t brought up by a theist)
The action of eating was not a sin. Nor was there “disobedience to a command”. Why? Because it wasn’t a command. It was a truth statement just like the Gospel message is a truth statement. “If you do X, Y will be the result”, period. This is what God “told” Adam. God didn’t “command Adam not to “do” something””. You’re thinking of sin as an action, or as Paul explained, “transgression of the law”, which it isn’t. If it were then we would not be “born in sin”. God’s very first words to Adam were not “you screwed up!”, because he didn’t screw up. Screwing up is an action. His very first words were, “who told you that?”, or “you did X (eat), and Y is the result”. (knowledge) The result was just as God said it would be. Death. Finite existence. Physical finite reality (or a death sentence awaiting judgement in a spirit prison), which is what physical reality actually is. This was not a “punishment”. This was a protection. Sin is a condition, not an action. You call it naturalism. It’s death. It’s a prison.

The next thing God did was to say, “And the LORD God said, Behold, the man is become as one of us, to know good and evil: and now, lest he put forth his hand, and take also of the tree of life, and eat, and live for ever:” Where do you suppose the thought that “God is keeping you from the goodness of this tree, and punishing you” came from? This lie (or “counterfeit” information) came from the same source, or person that lied to Eve. God is not punishing us. Think what would have happened if man would have eaten the tree of life and lived forever “in this condition”. <—-That would be hell? No, that IS hell. This is not a punishment either, but if you choose to die in this condition your death will be final. The same “person” that told Eve what he was not supposed to tell is also telling YOU that God is “punishing you”. The judgement will be carried out on the transgressor, not man. The transgression was committed against man, not by man. So Allen is very much right.

The Gospel message is the reversal of the original true message God gave Adam. If you do X, Y will be the result. Sin is a condition. You call it naturalism. The original condition of man was spiritual, and the Gospel “X” is the opposite of the original statement “X” and doing X reverses the condition, or reverts it back to the original. I’ll explain.

God said “if” you do this, “this will be the result”. The result is a condition of man who is finite, carnal, trapped in spirit prison (flesh), and dead. “If you do this you will die” This is what the term “die in your sin” means. When man gained the knowledge of sin and death he “learned” a different condition or state of being. Naturalism, or “physical, finite existence” Look around at this life you are calling “natural”. And you also call it life. I didn’t think life had graveyards. It is as God said it would be. It was the truth.

By contrast, the gospel message is the same message in reverse, and if it (X) is “done” reverses the condition (or reverts it back to its original). The opposite of death is birth, thus the saying from Jesus that you must be “born again this time of spirit” (so the saying “you were born in sin” is “you were born in flesh, prison, bondage”)The misconception is that this is a “step up”, or different “better condition” when in fact it is a step back.
Back to the original condition or state of man. Spiritual.
Man was originally created in a perpetual state of birth continually, eternally. This is why naturalist can’t “see” evidence of anything spiritual unless they actually become spiritual. You can’t see anything from the grave. What you think is “life”, isn’t.

Conclusion:

Here is what it looks like.

Original sin:

If you do X, Y will be the result.
“But of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it: for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die.”

The Gospel:

If you do X, Y will be the result.
“When the people heard this, they were cut to the heart and asked Peter and the other apostles, “Brothers, what shall we “do”?

X

Then Peter said unto them, “Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the REMISSION OF SINS (or do X. for the reversal of the condition), and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Spirit” (Y)

Jesus answered, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born of water and of the Spirit, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God. That which is born of the flesh is flesh; and that which is born of the Spirit is spirit. Marvel not that I said unto thee, Ye must be born again from above. Verily, verily, I say unto thee, “We” speak that we do know, and testify that we “have seen”; and ye receive not our witness.

I can’t hand you my eyes.

Footnote:
This is why I read only the King James Bible. Other translations have changed the word “remission” to “forgiveness” so it reads be baptised for the “forgiveness of sins”, which is from the same “person” that likes to tell lies. I don’t need forgiveness for something he did, and he is trying to pin the rap on you right now. I’m not buying his lies, but you can if that’s what you want to do. Not recommended.

Charee White “Here We Go Again”

Nothing introduces a new artist better than a live performance. I opted to feature the live video in the header because, lets face it… some things just speak for themselves.

Charee White didn’t win any television contest and get bankrolled, packaged, and delivered. This young lady is old school. She took the hard road. She’s paying her dues, and it’s paying off.

She is my breakout artist of the year pick for 2017.

Her rockin’ style of country is definitely taking her in a new direction…strait to the top of the charts. I have been following her since she played small clubs and venues in front of small crowds and a handful of diehard fans and family members. They all knew she was going places, as did I. Isn’t it good when your intuitions turn out to be right?

 

At the ripe old age of eighteen she was honored with the 2013 New Artist of the Year at the Inspirational Country Music Awards in Nashville . Chareè released her debut album, “Stronger,” with the first single charting at #17 and her second single going all the way to #1. Her new single from her album “Keepin It Country” did very well on the Country Breakout Chart, and got her the recognition she worked so hard for. Her dream is to “change the world one song at a time“. I think she has a great start, and her handful of die-hard fans has now grown to fill the seats of stadiums. She has a show with Kellie Pickler coming up this month, a girl who did in fact place a top spot in American Idol. Fate knows no ironies, but you can’t beat good old fashion hard work.

Whether you like rock, or country, blues, or bluegrass/folk/acoustic , she has you covered. Her newest album “Here We Go Again” came out just this week, and features six new songs as well as the bullet chart hit “Alive”. I invite all you Rockers, Bluesers, and Country music fans alike to give her a listen. You’ll be glad you did.

Website http://chareewhite.com
Facebook Page https://www.facebook.com/chareewhitemusic/
Twitter https://twitter.com/ChareeWhite
Charee White music store: http://chareewhite.com/store.html

Other sources:
CMT http://www.cmt.com/artists/charee-white/biography/ 

Just Another Animal?

We have “evolved”. Really? Purely by accident we have supposedly “adapted naturally to our environment”. This poses some questions that should be obvious. If the argument from Naturalism is that we “used to be” [this], and we have evolved into [this]. We came from cave man, even apes, both of which “lived outside”…in nature. Lets look at how every other “animal” has completed this transformation and see if there is a difference…see if we too are “just another animal”

The most common theme I see in the arguments for Naturalism are that everything evolved to become better suited for life “outside”. Thing is,  now we can’t survive outside, or in many instances without clothing, shelter, and “unnatural heat”.  We die from “exposure to the elements”, or exposure to “outside”. I will be the first to notice the irony of the fact that this argument can also be used for Naturalism. So many will agree that it is dependant upon one’s point of view, biases they hold, and their belief system. <—-This, however can not be said about any of the other “animals” in nature.

Another argument from Naturalism is that morality can be “seen” in the animal world. This is an ongoing debate about subjective morality vs objective morality, and that morality and empathy are one and the same. According to scripture we have been given a soul by a creator, which none of the other animals have. They are said to have a spirit, but not a soul. Approaching this argument from this perspective is a sure stalemate. Is there any obvious, noticeable differences in man and animal? Too many to list, but lets look at this morality vs empathy from a different angle.

Man hunts other animals for sport.

Name another animal that seems to “want to” kill “other animals”, and even his own peers for enjoyment. Is this the same moral code of ethics we see in “animals”? Are there any psychopathic serial killer penguins roaming the Arctic with a law enforcement agency representative penguin hot on its tale? Do we see animals telling their peers lies to swindle them out of their “stash”? Any practical joking ants, grasshoppers? The comedian wasp? Yea, they’ve been known to be quite hilarious=)

Man’s morality goes a bit further than animal empathy. They are not even close to being the same thing. If morality comes from the need to survive as a group, then where are all the laws for that group, the lawless, the rebels, and the long journey to distant lands to war with the others of their own species? How can Naturalism explain the difference in opinions, or even better, show that animals have opinions? Do all animals have a hive mentality? Do all animals care for their young until they are old enough to survive on their own?  The answer to most questions like this is no, so…why not?

Why do some animals “teach” their young, and some abandon them at conception (egg layers even before birth)?

If the “goal” of a naturally evolving organism is to reach the most efficient state of developement for the survival of the species, then why do some achieve this and some become extinct, when they have the exact same resources starting out? Does management come into play in this? Did man gain the usage of knowledge and choices through powers of reason, allowing him to simply “decide to manage” the fate of everything else in existence…by “evolving”? Or, is this also “managed” by reason and knowledge, and choice? No other animal has this morality, or “mentality”.

So if we are “just another animal”, why are we not like any of them?

A word about testimony

There is a reason God chose personal testimony as the one and only way for me to deliver knowledge of Himself to anyone else.

“A wicked and adulterous generation seeketh after a sign, and there shall no sign be given unto it, but the sign of the prophet Jonas. And he left them, and departed.” (Matthew 16:4)

This sign of Jonas is the actual Gospel, which is a “story” that the Son of Man will spend three days in the belly of the earth, and rise again. This story is all you get… period… that is if you are inclined to looking for “evidence” of the truth about mankind and his origin. This truth can be verified only by God Himself, and the testimony of the “Holy Spirit” which will be given to those that want it…again, period. There is no default “have to”and no imaginary, made up, arbitrary “rules” that apply, again…period.

Testimony is all you get. Why?

Many atheists seem to think atheism is an (or ‘the’) “default position”. This is interesting because I can remember in my earliest memories a “presence” that comforted me when “things”, (lights, shadows, sounds…) scared me. I remember this ‘presence’ as a “Comforter”, that was for all practical purposes “a parental superior”, (which actually had to rescue me from the fears my parents actually created). I remember this ‘presence’ was known to me and superior to my parents…and, (as I later learned), was actually called, “The Comforter”.

This Spirit is known to me now as “The Holy Spirit”. These memories were present before any knowledge of any God was available to me, as my family was not religious. Some of us have kept in touch with this spirit that comforted us in our infancy and learned of its name and constitution later in life when they could read and started to interact with the world.

Some had forgotten, and later in life were reminded by this same Spirit.

Who is giving me these words to type right now? My mind? My “ego”?

“But the Comforter, which is the Holy Ghost, whom the Father will send in my name, he shall teach you all things, and bring all things to your remembrance, whatsoever I have said unto you.” John 14:26 (KJV)

If God exists as a creator of “all that is”, then it logically follows that God is capable of imparting knowledge of Himself to anyone He decides to do so for. It also follows that such a manufacturer would only do so for those that have the common decency to humble themselves in the light of this knowledge that they are a manufactured being, which is what repentance actually means, and simply thank Him for their life, and ask the Him for their answers.

Just sayin’

666 What Is It?

Ironically, Atheism is one of the many evidences we as Christians see that they claim does not exist. This will be a look at the mark of “the beast”, the number, what it means, and Bible verses that pertain to atheism and naturalism. My main goal here is twofold. I also hope to give Christians a way to deal with the conflicts that arise from the “Gay Is Ok” sentiments that are now part of “normal society”. This post is not exclusively about this, but I just want to warn anyone sensitive to this issue that it will be brought up in the post. I in no way judge, or condemn anyone in this post, and I hope none of the Christians condemn anyone for anything. This is not what Christ teaches. 

The popular belief about the number 666 is that is is some taboo of evil, and often used by Satanist as a sort of flag. They seem quite proud of this. For starters , lets look at this number.

“Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six.” Revelation 13:18 (KJV)

First of all, notice that it is “the number of a man“. If it is our number, then why do people think it is evil? The text states that this is wisdom, and a great mystery. What is this  “mystery”? The number is often debated today, believe it or not, without many even being aware of it. It is the ongoing popular debate about morality. Most atheist will say that objective morality does not come from God, and that God is not “needed“, for man to have morality.

The number 666 literally means, “A man without God’s morals, or God’s moral law, is a “beast”, or “animal”, and that a ,man without God’s moral law will “evolve” into an animal, by adopting animal morality, or a “natural morality”.

This “mark” is something many think will be a physical mark that people will “receive from someone, or something“. Scripture actually states that this mark is “in” the head, not on the head. It is actually a frame of mind, and the frame of mind that we now call “naturalism“. Lets look at a few more verses that show this, and atheism, or “naturalism”.

[Note here: Anyone that is familiar with my studies knows that I stress the use of the King James Version. Many are unaware of the differences, which some are “subtle”, the same word used when Eve was being “fooled”. You may use whatever version you wish, but there is a link to the above mentioned verse at the bottom of the post, in all known translations. Please note the versions, and the KJV, and the word “in” changed to “on” in the other translations. This is a very dangerous error to overlook such a small, or “subtle” change. Remember, Satan fooled Eve by changing just one word. He took God’s words and changed the meaning of “will surely die”, to will “not” surely die. Food for thought.]

“And even as they did not like to retain God “in’ their knowledge”, God gave them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not convenient;” Romans 1:28 (KJV)

Reprobate, defined by the Oxford dictionary:
“a person who behaves in a way that society thinks is immoral”

Without getting into an entirely different subject, just know that in the original text God is not doing this as a punishment. The original text describes God’s intention as “out of compassion“.

Monkeys are said to be reprobates. Interestingly, modern man wants to teach our children that we are the same as apes. Ok, that’s fine, but not my children. They know better, and as a result, so do their friends. I hope you teach your children to read the the scriptures.

Lets consider how society has “evolved”, with the denouncing of God’s role in it’s government, and the push to remove God from any influence in society, or…”a-theism”.
What has morality “evolved” into now? Now, just like dogs, or animals that roam the streets at night looking for a new dog of the opposite sex to “screw around with” (pun intended), it is perfectly normal and morally acceptable to sleep with a different person every night. In today’s world this doesn’t seem to be immoral at all. In fact, it is seen as a trophy of sorts to men in modern society.

“Animal like”?….

Most definitely.

verse 29: “Being filled with all unrighteousness, fornication, wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness; full of envy, murder, debate, deceit, malignity; whisperers,…“30:“slanderers, haters of God, insolent, arrogant, boastful, inventors of evil, disobedient to parents,”

verse 27 is really interesting, as it shows the obvious difference in man’s morality, and God’s morality. Atheist argue that “morality is morality”. There is no “higher” morality.
“And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet.” Romans 1:27 (KJV)

“Gay is ok” (there is no ‘higher morality’)

Anyone that thinks homosexuality is wrong is a bigot. Now you might understand the reason for me using Phil Robertson in this post. Before anyone jumps to conclusions, part of this same scripture is this verse, “Therefore thou art inexcusable, O man, whosoever thou art that judgest: for wherein thou judgest another, thou condemnest thyself; for thou that judgest doest the same things.” Romans 2:1 (KJV) Before you point fingers at gay people, remember what Jesus said about “casting the first stone”. Please know that God will always side with the person you are pointing at against you, and Jesus has not changed his mind about this. This post is running a bit long, so I will wrap this up.

Know that I judge no one. I do not judge homosexuals, nor does Phil Robertson. However, I’m sure my words will be twisted out of spite, and I will end up being mocked by these same atheist, but just as Jesus was mocked the same as we all will be, I expect this to happen. As Christians, you should expect this too. How do we address these things today, and still live in this “new age morality”, and remain true to our faith? Simple. By example, not by words.

Smile, and love all people. Do not treat anybody as “different”. Do not judge. Love.

“Do not be overcome by evil, but overcome evil with good” Romans 12:21

You will never overcome hatred by the hatred of hatred!

I think it’s an interesting study, and if anyone looks around the earth and is in touch with anything close to reality, they will see these verses playing themselves out in real time. No evidence the Bible is true you say?
-Peace.

http://biblehub.com/revelation/13-16.htm